Ravenna Council Committees Debate E Bike Rules, Housing Standards and Safety Building Levy

The Ravenna City Council focuses on tightening e‑bike rules and helmet requirements, then turns to raising multifamily housing and rental standards while tackling ward redistricting, ethics reforms, fire department space needs, and a growing mental health crisis. 72mins

Was this helpful?

Original Meeting

Monday, August 10th, 2026
8986.0
City Council_ 8_10_26
In This Video
  • Council Member Harper shared a police department handout on bicycle regulations to clarify legal requirements and urged tightening local ordinances to better address dangerous or illegal bike use.
  • City Engineer Finney and Council Member Harper clarified state regulations for different classes of bikes and motorized vehicles, including age and licensing rules and where they were permitted to operate.
  • Council Member Harper and a speaker explained manufacturer labeling requirements for bike classes, emphasized that engines were not to be used on sidewalks, and outlined class 3 e‑bike limits including age restrictions and motor assistance cutoff at 28 mph.
  • Officials discussed e‑bikes as affordable transportation, highlighted the need for safe roadway and sidewalk rules, considered sidewalk speed limits, and emphasized public education and stronger local codes to support police enforcement.
  • Officials questioned how to enforce class 1 e‑bike rules such as helmet and motor-use requirements, discussed penalties and possible licensing programs used in other communities, and raised future concerns about how scooters fit into sidewalk safety regulations.
  • Police Chief Smallfield clarified that state law did not specifically regulate class 1 or class 2 e‑bikes, described concerns about young riders on roadways, and emphasized that officers were stopping kids on sidewalks to provide ongoing education and encourage safer habits over time.
  • Officials discussed improving safety for children and residents by proposing a local helmet ordinance for riders under 18, exploring positive incentive programs to encourage helmet use, and noting that a clear helmet requirement would simplify enforcement for police.
  • A speaker recommended setting sidewalk speed limits, reinforcing existing rules against motor use on sidewalks, and urging the city to address overgrown vegetation that narrowed sidewalks and created conflicts between cyclists and pedestrians.
  • A speaker cited a newly signed Ohio law exposing e‑bike riders to vehicular homicide liability for serious crashes and raised concerns about how insurance coverage would work for riders who were not required to carry the same documentation as motorists, speculating that claims might fall under homeowners or renters policies.
  • A speaker described a child riding a gas-powered mini bike at high speeds on city sidewalks and urged the city to prohibit such use, while Police Chief Smallfield explained that officers exercised discretion to issue tickets or warnings and send riders home.
  • A speaker described unlicensed ATVs and non‑compliant golf carts operating on city streets, questioned their use of taxpayer-funded roads without proper licensing, and urged officials to expand regulations to address these growing safety and enforcement concerns.
  • A speaker suggested partnering with the Portage County Health District’s “Put a lid on it” program to secure funding for children’s bike helmets so lack of equipment would not prevent compliance with potential safety requirements.
  • Council Member Harper sought input on advancing a helmet requirement immediately or as part of a broader package, and after a speaker strongly endorsed prompt action on helmets, agreed to move that item forward while continuing work on wider streets and sidewalks safety issues.
  • City Engineer Finney outlined a $133,000 stormwater infrastructure plan for 2026 covering catch basin and pipe upgrades on North Scranton Street, erosion control along the ditch by North Freedom Street near the bike trail, and continued work on the Jones Avenue storm project, and the committee agreed to move the item forward.
  • City Engineer Finney explained that many 811 excavation notifications occurred without the city’s knowledge and proposed instituting fees for roadway work permits so officials could better track and manage street work while securing funds to address potential damage.
  • A speaker referenced recent incidents of utility lines being struck and asked about logistics for state excavation notifications, while City Engineer Finney outlined an in‑house email process to handle up to 500 annual notices and confirmed that city staff would continue going out to mark utilities when required.
  • A speaker outlined a new ward redistricting effort prompted by Ravenna’s highly disproportionate voter representation, explaining the city’s partnership with the League of Women Voters and inviting extensive public feedback on proposed ward map changes.
  • A speaker described plans for at least two public sessions where residents could review and draw ward maps using an online tool, emphasized keeping neighborhood character intact while adjusting boundaries around Routes 59 and 44, and stressed completing redistricting before January so upcoming ward elections and candidate eligibility would be clearly defined.
  • A speaker outlined plans to post the ward‑mapping tool on the city website, described upcoming public presentations with League of Women Voters support, and explained that while ward boundaries were set in local code and guided by Ohio law, council would ultimately vote on any redistricting changes rather than sending them to the ballot.
  • A speaker outlined concerns about Ravenna’s minimal multifamily housing space standards and proposed adopting Ohio Housing Finance Agency tiered square‑footage requirements to support affordable housing while protecting property values.
  • A speaker contrasted the Ohio Building Code’s bare‑minimum safety space standards with the Ohio Housing Finance Agency’s larger, livability‑focused requirements and explained that aligning local multifamily rules with OHFA was key to attracting builders using low‑income housing tax credits.
  • A speaker argued that adopting Ohio Housing Finance Agency space requirements would improve livability for renters, attract more invested developers, protect property values, and enable projects to qualify for low‑income housing tax credits compared to Ravenna’s current smaller multifamily and duplex standards.
  • A speaker criticized a delayed vote on a multifamily project that lacked solidified standards and setback compliance and concluded that residents relied on local codes to protect safety and livability, urging clearer square‑footage requirements for future developments.
  • A speaker urged stronger oversight of rental properties by requiring a 24/7 local contact, regular inspections with higher penalties for noncompliance, and tighter enforcement of conditional uses to prevent problematic multifamily conversions and improve community quality.
  • A speaker acknowledged that the proposed housing changes would require amending multiple code sections, advocated adopting the Ohio Housing Finance Agency model to qualify projects for low‑income housing tax credits, and criticized the Ohio Building Code’s extremely minimal space standards as allowing inhumane, closet‑sized living conditions.
  • Fire Chief Chapple and a speaker described unsafe multifamily conversions in century homes where some units lacked proper kitchens and relied on hot plates and bathroom sinks, noting that such residential units were not subject to local inspection requirements despite other communities mandating kitchen access standards.
  • Fire Chief Chapple supported reducing unsafe five‑unit conversions to fewer, safer dwelling units that would likely increase property value, while a speaker read the zoning definition of a dwelling unit—emphasizing required cooking facilities—and suggested the mobile home exclusion might need revision.
  • City Engineer Finney and a speaker discussed how current rental setups were being treated as multifamily dwellings due to gaps in the code, clarified that new space requirements would not retroactively affect existing units, and explained that nonconforming or conditional uses would only lapse after 12 months of nonuse.
  • Speakers acknowledged broader zoning code issues around boarding and rooming houses but chose to focus on a narrower set of changes for now, noting that an unoccupied facility offered an opportunity while cautioning against overwhelming council with too many revisions at once.
  • City Engineer Finney and a speaker described zoning challenges on West Main Street, noting that homes zoned for commercial use were originally built as residential, that one long‑vacant former dental office would need setback variances to become multifamily housing, and that council might need to consider reverting the area to residential zoning.
  • City Engineer Finney and speakers reviewed how the code defined multifamily versus duplex housing, suggested adding duplex as a conditional use to better regulate it, and criticized existing four‑ and five‑tenant units as harmful to neighborhood quality and unfair to residents despite being treated as livable space.
  • A speaker described nearby homes being bought by nonlocal investors and urged the city to quickly strengthen and enforce housing standards so investment activity would not undermine neighborhood quality or community values.
  • A speaker described ongoing safety and enforcement problems tied to certain multifamily rentals, cited a past hot plate fire in one unit, and asked City Engineer Finney how dwelling definitions could better specify acceptable cooking appliances so hot plates would not automatically qualify.
  • City Engineer Finney explained that listed cooking appliances met the dwelling definition, acknowledged concerns about a bedroom unit lacking a true kitchen and only outside access before gaining access to another unit, and responded to a remark about letting such problem units burn rather than repeatedly addressing fire risks.
  • A resident who recently bought a flipped home described unpermitted air‑conditioning work, voiced broader safety concerns about large older houses carved into multiple units with hot plates, and urged officials to pursue tougher code enforcement and reforms despite the challenges of change.
  • A speaker encouraged residents to speak up and asked whether the city could explicitly define a kitchen as requiring a stove, refrigerator, and sink in its housing standards.
  • A speaker suggested requiring certificates of occupancy for each correctly zoned rental unit so inspections could determine whether a true dwelling unit existed, emphasizing that makeshift setups like a hot plate and a bucket should not qualify as a proper kitchen and bathroom.
  • City Engineer Finney and a speaker acknowledged that while new rental proposals could have conditions added by the Planning Commission, existing rental properties could not be retroactively changed because a prior attempt to do so had been challenged as a Fourth Amendment violation.
  • A speaker urged adopting Ohio Housing Finance Agency bedroom‑based space metrics to simplify Planning Commission decisions, attract tax‑credit‑eligible investors, prevent overcrowded units, and protect residents’ quality of life in future developments.
  • Cheryl Wood urged council to use the new comprehensive plan to overhaul zoning codes rather than pursue hazardous spot zoning, explained how Ohio Housing Finance Agency tax credits applied mainly to larger multifamily projects, offered to share expertise on aligning local standards with those programs, and encouraged a long‑term vision for rebuilding Ravenna the right way.
  • A speaker reiterated support for applying Ohio Housing Finance Agency standards across residential districts and pressed officials to have tangible code changes ready within two weeks for the Committee of the Whole, emphasizing that council needed detailed draft language to properly evaluate the proposal.
  • A speaker cited Ohio Ethics Commission guidance on conflicts of interest and urged council to amend the design review guidelines so that members with personal or financial interests would fully recuse by abstaining not only from voting but also from any related discussion or involvement.
  • Speakers pointed out gaps in the commission’s rules by urging added language to protect applicants when meetings lack a quorum and calling for clearer incorporation of Ohio Ethics Commission conflict‑of‑interest guidance, including highlighting the relevant section of the ethics document for council review.
  • Speakers clarified when applicants could appeal to council by agreeing to restore a 30‑day option alongside multiple denials and decided to advance proposed updates incorporating Ohio Ethics Commission recusal guidelines—extending conflict‑of‑interest rules beyond just abstaining from the vote—to the Committee of the Whole for further review.
  • Finance Director Lorence reviewed the city’s annual property and casualty insurance renewal process, noted recent moderate premium increases, and confirmed that new policy quotes covering vehicles, equipment, assets, and leases were expected before the Committee of the Whole meeting ahead of the September 14th effective date.
  • A speaker questioned hiring consultants before a ballot initiative passed, while City Engineer Finney explained that pre‑ballot design and budgeting work—costing $7,000 to $14,000—was needed to refine the project concept and establish a total budget for a potential $25 million proposal to present to voters in November.
  • A speaker expressed opposition to spending $14,000 on project work before the ballot initiative passed, arguing it would be a waste if the measure failed and that delaying could avoid losing money as future costs changed.
  • A speaker stated on the record that City Engineer Finney’s grant applications through officials such as David Joyce and Heidi Workman for police and fire facility upgrades had been fully denied, criticized higher-level representatives for prioritizing projects like playgrounds over safety forces despite touring Ravenna’s poor conditions, and emphasized that residents should know these funding efforts were made and are documented in public records.
  • A speaker reported that updated quotes for additional cold storage on Spruce Street for a fire truck differed from the original estimate, prompting consideration of new options despite previously appropriated funding.
  • Fire Chief Chapple described severe space and heating issues that left a fire engine stored offsite over winter and asked council to weigh the long‑term value of a more expensive permanent storage option versus a cheaper, shorter‑term structure for housing the apparatus.
  • Fire Chief Chapple explained that the department’s regularly used second‑due engine would need to be housed offsite because of limited station space, noting that a new ladder engine could fit in the current station but would force another apparatus into cold storage or a separate facility.
  • Fire Chief Chapple and City Engineer Finney explained that the project drew a single, higher bid due to its complexity and bowstring roof, with the Chief recommending the more durable Plan A and suggesting that if no project moved forward this year, council should instead fund heating for the existing cold storage building to keep the fire apparatus on city property.
  • Police Chief Smallfield and Fire Chief Chapple described how using a shared building for vehicle processing and in‑house apparatus maintenance sometimes blocked a parked fire truck, underscoring the need for more dedicated space to safely service city vehicles.
  • Finance Director Lorence and Fire Chief Chapple weighed the cost‑benefit of a new vehicle building against tight small capital budgets, with the Chief suggesting interim investments like adding heat, water, and electric to existing cold storage to improve apparatus housing until a potential levy‑funded station could be built.
  • City Engineer Finney and speakers explained that the existing Quonset Hut could not accommodate the ladder truck and discussed installing a manufacturer-built, insulated steel structure with garage doors as a long-term, budget-conscious solution that could later serve multiple city departments while avoiding an additional $100,000 in spending.
  • Fire Chief Chapple urged prompt approval of appropriations so a 7–8 week ladder truck storage project with major concrete work could be completed before winter, and officials agreed to move it forward with an emergency clause given the accelerated truck delivery timeline.
  • Finance Director Lorence and Fire Chief Chapple explained that signing an MOU to join a Medicaid ambulance supplemental funding program would tap unused federal dollars via the city’s existing billing service and could provide an estimated $50,000–$75,000 in additional annual revenue based on call volume.
  • A speaker described escalating 24/7 mental health crises straining police, medics, downtown businesses, and neighborhoods, and urged council to consider leveraging funding and public accountability to push service providers to offer adequate care and support.
  • Speakers criticized funded agencies and rental programs for failing to provide promised case management to vulnerable residents, described constant police and medic responses to unmanaged mental health crises, and insisted that service providers must start answering calls and taking responsibility before conditions worsen further.
Your Governments
Your governments list is empty.